>

中国体彩大乐透推荐

时间: 2019年11月15日 07:41 阅读:5263

中国体彩大乐透推荐

� And you were not in London? MARIE DE VICHY-CHAMBRON, MARQUISE DU DEFFAND 中国体彩大乐透推荐 And you were not in London? Poor Keeling鈥檚 head whirled: a moment ago his wife had said that the two were great friends only on the spiritual plane, now she was saying precisely what she had begun by contradicting. He was satisfied, however, that he had her true opinion at last. It did not appear to him to be{149} worth anything, but there it was. He got up. 鈥淗ave I not spoken plainly? Say no more about it.鈥? � Chapter 4 Communicating � Keeling felt, in spite of his business-like habits,{273} that this was unnecessary. True, this was a matter of business, and he should have verified the correctness of Lord Inverbroom鈥檚 information. But instead he merely put it into his pocket. There is no portion of a novelist鈥檚 work in which this fault of episodes is so common as in the dialogue. It is so easy to make any two persons talk on any casual subject with which the writer presumes himself to be conversant! Literature, philosophy, politics, or sport, may thus be handled in a loosely discursive style; and the writer, while indulging himself and filling his pages, is apt to think that he is pleasing his reader. I think he can make no greater mistake. The dialogue is generally the most agreeable part of a novel; but it is only so as long as it tends in some way to the telling of the main story. It need not seem to be confined to that, but it should always have a tendency in that direction. The unconscious critical acumen of a reader is both just and severe. When a long dialogue on extraneous matter reaches his mind, he at once feels that he is being cheated into taking something which he did not bargain to accept when he took up that novel. He does not at that moment require politics or philosophy, but he wants his story. He will not perhaps be able to say in so many words that at some certain point the dialogue has deviated from the story; but when it does so he will feel it, and the feeling will be unpleasant. Let the intending novel-writer, if he doubt this, read one of Bulwer鈥檚 novels 鈥?in which there is very much to charm 鈥?and then ask himself whether he has not been offended by devious conversations. The following accounts will show what ministers of the gospel will have to encounter who undertake faithfully to express their sentiments in slave states. The first is an article by Dr. Bailey, of the Era of April 3, 1852: � And you were not in London? [205]